Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Simeon McMillan's avatar

Hey Andrew, Fantastic piece! It felt like you were reading my mind regarding the insane bullishness of Meta’s recent options package.

I completely agree that for a company like Meta to hand out out-of-the-money options where the floor is $1,116 signals massive internal conviction. However, I do want to offer a gentle pushback on your thought that the stock multiplying to hit these targets is "probably not" going to happen due to the base rate of trillion-dollar companies…

In my latest piece, ""Back to the EBITDA: Decoding Meta’s $1,116 Executive Playbook", I reverse-engineered the math needed to hit that $1,116 floor target by the board's Feb-2028 accelerator date. When you break down the income statement, that lower tranche is actually very achievable.

Assuming a standard 25x multiple, Meta needs to generate roughly $111 billion to $115 billion in net income to justify the $1,116 share price.

To do that while keeping their ~42% operating margins intact, they need about $315 billion in revenue. This implies an optimistic, but very doable, ~25% annualized revenue growth.

The market is panicking over CapEx, but they don't have to sacrifice margins to fund the AI buildout. By trimming the fat—specifically cutting Reality Labs' burn down to a $5 billion to $6 billion baseline and executing a 20% workforce reduction (or more)—they offset the massive data center depreciation hits with hard cash operating savings.

If hitting $1,116 just requires baseline operational discipline and pulling the right margin levers, the upper-end strikes get incredibly interesting. In my next article, I'll actually be sharing the math on what the income statement needs to look like to push the stock into the $2,000 and $3,000 per share range.

Keep up the great writing! Best, Simeon

Deep dive here: https://www.accruedint.com/p/back-to-the-ebitda-decoding-metas

Marc Brown's avatar

Maybe a much smaller organic IRR layered atop 10% annual inflation rate?

No posts

Ready for more?