Data privacy! Omg. One company having this much access. All emails all health data credit cards etc. this could easily lead to abuse by meta in terms of data sharing and steering and back end payments for access or worse a huge Ai hack that totally screws people over. For me. I’ll wait and let time determine how this can be done safely.
"So here’s my ask: download Muse, give it access to your email, and use it for everything for 72 hours." I'm curious if you have thought about how giving a third-party access to all of your emails impacts client-attorney privilege in any email communications with your attorney, or spousal privilege for every email with your spouse? All of those communications, after being shared with a third-party, have lost their privilege and would be discoverable in a divorce, lawsuit or criminal investigation. My understanding is that Muse also has the ability to access text messages, and has even accessed text messages despite being instructed by the user not to do so. Every text message with your spouse would then become discoverable.
So I have been doing most of this in the new ChatGPT after switching back from Claude. Switching cost are real BTW. One thing I noticed with Muse is it has less guardrails. Chat wouldn't download substack PDFs for me because of copyright even though I was a paid sub. Muse had no qualms with it. So am I wrong in assuming it's only an aggressive agent, not fundamentally different that the others?
Is Muse different than ChatGPT in a meaningful way? I do much of the same things you mention with Chat...though I have resisted giving Chat access to my brokerage accounts, would be handy, but feels very dangerous still.
By reading dotcom articles, there was a belief that people could easily compare prices on websites and choose the cheapest options unlike physical stores. As a result, it turned out not to be true. However, I agree agents are different
This is the market version of your 72-hour challenge. Since Muse launched, a Goldman basket of stocks seen as vulnerable to widespread AI-agent use has slid sharply, and the selling has already spread to wealth managers, brokerages, and even big banks. Investors are starting to price the exact displacement you are describing.
Data privacy! Omg. One company having this much access. All emails all health data credit cards etc. this could easily lead to abuse by meta in terms of data sharing and steering and back end payments for access or worse a huge Ai hack that totally screws people over. For me. I’ll wait and let time determine how this can be done safely.
"So here’s my ask: download Muse, give it access to your email, and use it for everything for 72 hours." I'm curious if you have thought about how giving a third-party access to all of your emails impacts client-attorney privilege in any email communications with your attorney, or spousal privilege for every email with your spouse? All of those communications, after being shared with a third-party, have lost their privilege and would be discoverable in a divorce, lawsuit or criminal investigation. My understanding is that Muse also has the ability to access text messages, and has even accessed text messages despite being instructed by the user not to do so. Every text message with your spouse would then become discoverable.
Muse helped me save ~$350 today on my GEICO Auto policy
So I have been doing most of this in the new ChatGPT after switching back from Claude. Switching cost are real BTW. One thing I noticed with Muse is it has less guardrails. Chat wouldn't download substack PDFs for me because of copyright even though I was a paid sub. Muse had no qualms with it. So am I wrong in assuming it's only an aggressive agent, not fundamentally different that the others?
What specifically did you do with the time that using Muse freed up?
Is Muse different than ChatGPT in a meaningful way? I do much of the same things you mention with Chat...though I have resisted giving Chat access to my brokerage accounts, would be handy, but feels very dangerous still.
By reading dotcom articles, there was a belief that people could easily compare prices on websites and choose the cheapest options unlike physical stores. As a result, it turned out not to be true. However, I agree agents are different
This is the market version of your 72-hour challenge. Since Muse launched, a Goldman basket of stocks seen as vulnerable to widespread AI-agent use has slid sharply, and the selling has already spread to wealth managers, brokerages, and even big banks. Investors are starting to price the exact displacement you are describing.
I'm very impressed by Muse.
On a lark, I asked it to pull 30-year yield from FRED and CPI and plot it on graph.
This is what it produced.
https://x.com/rationalyst/status/2103779828105089172/photo/2
Data hallucination is always a worry, but if you pair it with a data subscription and MCP/API access, I think it will be a dream supporting analyst.